
58,453 members
Tell us what you think! How can we make Social better? Please also report any bugs you find in this group š
Whose great idea was it to put notifications on the top left corner where the jama logo is? I canāt even click on this so canāt access the notifs!
@Muslimah7
Tagging people should not be allowed in anon posts. I think most of the drama that comes out of anon posts is because of tagging certain people. I think the algorithm also kinda boosts anon posts with a tag.
@msidex
šš PLEASE, I NEED YOUR HONEST OPINION ON THIS!
I met a lady on Muzz, we matched and we started talking.
Everything was normal until the next day, when she told me she was having issues with her accommodation.
Apparently, she was staying with her aunt who sent her packing because she felt the girl wasn't doing enough housework.
Mind you the girl is a student at the University of Abuja does part-time work and wasn't even feeling too well at the time.
The next thing she told me she was looking for somewhere to stay. Before I could even suggest anything, she made it clear that staying with a man was not an option. Fair enough! š
Then she said she wanted to get an apartment but she needed money to sort herself out.
Her plan? Borrow money from me and pay me back when she received her salary.
Now, let me remind you: WE HAVE NEVER MET IN PERSON! šš
Someone I only met on a dating app is already asking me to consider lending her money.
Honestly, I sympathise with her situation and I understand that anyone can find themselves in difficult circumstances. But at the same time trust takes time to build.
So, let me ask you: If you were in my shoes, would you lend money to someone you've never met but have been chatting with on a dating app or would you politely decline?
Let's hear your opinion
@ak_
Cannot click to open notifications - theyāre stuck behind the time of my phone - iOS27 iPhone 12 mini
@Sabii_00
A sincere request to the Jamaa moderation team. š¤
@shaz @Nurcann @anum10
I would like to respectfully bring something to your attention.
Recently, I've noticed public posts targeting Anum, including personal remarks about her character, accusations of dishonesty, and claims that she's abusing her authority.
I completely understand that everyone has the right to question moderation decisions and express their concerns. However, there's a difference between constructive criticism and publicly attacking someone's character.
I personally witnessed Anum spending several days trying to resolve the ongoing conflict fairly. I even approached her myself when Nasibaah was banned, and I genuinely appreciated her willingness to listen and help.
That doesn't mean Anum is above criticism or that every decision she makes is perfect. But she deserves the same fairness, dignity, and respect as every other member of this community.
I'm respectfully asking @shaz and @Nurcann to review these posts and hold anyone who violates the community guidelines accountable, regardless of who they are or which side they support. If there are genuine concerns about Anum's moderation, those should also be investigated fairly.
We cannot expect moderators to maintain a respectful environment while allowing personal attacks against them to go unaddressed.
This isn't about taking sides. It's about applying the same standards to everyone.
May Allah guide us toward justice, accountability, and mutual respect. Ameen. š¤²š¤
@Anti-fragile
Can't believe I have to start my Friday morning with something as stupid as this š¤¦āāļø but can the Muzz team already take back control from Anum, the admin/mod of Random group. There have been a plethora of complaints against her by innumerable Jamaa members for misusing her power, day in & day out š
A harmless comment of mine was hidden by her, after which she blocked me out of her desperation to malign a sister (Nasibah from US) here & in her wildly unislamic attempt to drive a one-sided narrative against her. I'm assuming anyone who contradicts this narrative & shares their pov gets blockedāļø
Seriously, get the paid members of the app to start doing their jobs seriously instead of banking upon these unpaid labour stints to take control of the app.
Don't remember the exact words I wrote in the comment but they were on the lines of -
I've never seen Sabi & Nasibah ādisturbing the peace of the communityā, as falsely claimed by that juvenile admin of Random group from Pakistan. If anything, I've always seen Nasibah helping BOTH THE BROTHERS AND SISTERS HERE with her matrimonial posts, helping the community out & driving the engagement on this app for free, without being asked & all in goodwill when those who are actually paid couldn't care less about letting abusive behaviour go unchecked or letting Hindus and Israelis join an app that promises to be for Muslims.
As for the other set of ppl tagged in her post, they are THE MOST attention-seeking bunch on Jamaa, who are often seen creating a ruckus here, every now & then. All I asked Anum was to not tag me in future posts of hers because I couldn't care less about what lonely, immature ppl who don't have a life outside this social media app are doing on the other side of the world, as long as me & mine here are diligently looking for compatible potentials.
I had ended the comment with a dua for our hearts to be softened by Allah swt & that may He swt Enable us to start behaving our respective ages. Until then, none of us are ready for something as responsible & sacred as marriage.
Pls accept her dramatic, attention-seeking resignation as she suggested in her latest post & save us all from this constant toxic behaviour, especially on a Friday morning where ideally all of us should be engrossed in different acts of amplified worship instead of waking up & dying for attention.
JazakAllah khair š»āØ
@e853261
These Muzmeets
Are they any good ?
It sounds like a blind date between 5 men and women
What if you immediately realise you are unattracted to all the other attendees ?
@Whoknowsanymore
Can there please be a notification or some kind of message when someone has seen or rejected your compliment, and can the rejectors and failed talking stages be removed from the liked/favorited/complimented sections? I hate that you have to literally view a personās profile just to see if they rejected you, and I donāt want to keep going back to someoneās profile multiple times a day to see if they rejected or not.
Also, I donāt want my feed of liked/favorited potentials to be cluttered with people who it didnāt work out for. I can unfavorite anyone in the favorited section that I have favorited, I can unlike anyone I havenāt complimented in the like section, but I canāt unlike or remove anyone from the liked or complimented who matched and didnāt work out or rejected me. That doesnāt make any sense from a UI perspective.
Also, most of the time the app wonāt let you see all of the people you liked, but tbh that wouldnāt be a problem if the above was addressed lol.
@tinyhabits
please disable tagging for anonymous posts altogether. if someone chooses to post anonymously, the option to tag other users shouldnāt be available.
@persianprincess
@Muzz, could you please look at this post and clarify your safeguarding procedures?
A user has expressed serious concerns about their own wellbeing, including repeatedly hitting their head and refusing to eat, and has since gone quiet.
I have responded with compassion and shared support resources. Iām not asking for the post to be removed or for anybodyās private information to be disclosed. Iām concerned about this personās welfare.
What procedures does Jamaa have in place for assessing a post like this and, where appropriate, checking on the personās safety or escalating a credible risk of serious harm?
I would appreciate confirmation that concerns of this nature can reach the appropriate safeguarding team. Thank you.