Politics
119,959 members
This is your platform to share opinions, stay informed, and engage in civil discourse with fellow members who share a passion for politics and governance. Please be respectful to one another and above all remember to keep it halal.
Well formed structured rebuttal to the key objections too Tommy
- Objection: "The numbers don't lie" (60% immigrant mothers in London, 78% foreign descent in Brussels).
· Rebuttal: The numbers are often misleading without context. "Immigrant mother" in London data often includes second-generation women (born in the UK) who have a foreign-born parent. Furthermore, Brussels' statistics are inflated by its role as an EU capital (diplomats, NGO workers) and its unique history. More importantly, correlation does not equal causation. High immigrant birth rates are a symptom of aging native populations and low domestic birth rates (below replacement level). The "problem" is demography, not immigration.
- Objection: "Mass immigration is an intentional agenda by the far-left/establishment to break down identity."
· Rebuttal: This is a conspiracy fallacy (assuming intent without evidence). The primary driver of immigration in the West is economic demand (cheap labor for agriculture, construction, care homes) and aging workforces, not a cabal. Capitalist corporations (often right-leaning) push for labor mobility. The "far-left" generally opposes neoliberal open-border policies. You cannot blame both "globalist corporations" and "Marxists" for the same policy, as they are ideological opposites.
- Objection: "Muslims do not integrate; they stay separate (school playgrounds, no mixed friend groups)."
· Rebuttal: This confuses self-segregation due to racism with religious choice. In Luton, studies show that Muslim parents often keep children separate because non-Muslim children bully them for their faith or race. The "white flight" Robinson describes—where English families move out when Muslims move in—is also a form of non-integration. Integration is a two-way street. Furthermore, data shows second/third-generation Muslims have higher English proficiency and intermarriage rates than first-generation, directly contradicting the "never integrate" claim.
- Objection: "Quran 5:51 forbids friendships with Christians/Jews, causing grooming gangs and hostility."
· Rebuttal: This is scriptural cherry-picking. The verse refers to taking political allies against the Muslim community in a state of war (context of 7th-century Medina), not social friendship. The overwhelming majority of British Muslims have non-Muslim friends, work colleagues, and neighbors. The grooming gangs (Rotherham, Telford) were a horrific crime, but government inquiries (Prof. Alexis Jay) found the primary cause was institutional failure (police feared being called racist), not a systematic Quranic mandate. 90%+ of convicted groomers were not "devout" but opportunistic criminals.
- Objection: "Two-tier policing" (police arrest white patriots but not pro-Palestinian protesters or Muslim criminals).
· Rebuttal: Data disproves this. In 2023/24, UK police arrested more far-right protesters than Islamist protesters, but only because far-right marches (like the "Unite the Kingdom" rally) had higher rates of public order offenses (throwing bottles, racial aggravation). The pro-Palestinian marches involved over 1 million attendees; the arrest rate was lower per capita because they were overwhelmingly peaceful. The Henry Vincent case mentioned is misleading: the police handcuffed the white victim initially to treat his stab wounds (standard triage) before arresting the attackers.
- Objection: "40,000 Muslims on a terror watch list; Islam causes violence."
· Rebuttal: That figure is the total number of individuals referred to Prevent (a counter-extremism program), not convicted terrorists. A referral can be for anything from sharing a video to saying a phrase online. Furthermore, the vast majority of terror plots in the UK (by conviction rate) are from far-right white nationalists (Darren Osborne, Thomas Mair) and Irish republicans, not Islamists. In 2023, MI5 reported that Islamist plots were at their lowest proportion in a decade.
- Objection: "Muslims are a burden on the state/benefits (Somali 90% on benefits)."
· Rebuttal: The Somali statistic (often from Minnesota) is decontextualized. Refugees and asylum seekers are legally not allowed to work for the first 6-12 months, forcing them into benefits. After integration and language training, second-generation Somalis have employment rates approaching the national average. Furthermore, studies (Oxford Migration Observatory) show that European Muslims pay more in VAT and council tax as a percentage of their income than the average native, due to lower tax avoidance.
- Objection: "We need to 'encourage' (pay) non-integrated Muslims to leave."
· Rebuttal: This is ethnic cleansing by financial incentive. It is a human rights violation under the 4th Geneva Convention (forcible transfer of populations). If applied, it would set a precedent that any group the government deems "non-integrated" (Sikhs, Jews, atheists) could be legally bought out. Furthermore, it is logistically impossible: You cannot prove "lack of integration" legally, and you cannot strip citizenship from natural-born British Muslims, who are as native as Robinson.
- Objection: "Christians reformed; Islam cannot reform."
· Rebuttal: This ignores history. The Christian Reformation involved 150 years of wars that killed 8 million people (Thirty Years' War). Islam is currently in its own reformation, but it is only 50 years old. Moreover, the "UAE/Saudi reform" Robinson dismisses is actually a massive shift: Saudi Arabia has banned corporal punishment in schools, allowed women to drive, and opened a cinema. Indonesia (the largest Muslim nation) is a democracy with secular laws. Change is happening, but it requires time and lack of Western bombing.
- Objection: "If a school gets massacred, that will be the tipping point for civil war."
· Rebuttal: This is a dangerous self-fulfilling prophecy. By publicly predicting that Islamists will attack a school and that this will justify mass violence/civil war, Robinson is providing a rhetorical blueprint for vigilantes. Furthermore, after the Manchester Arena bombing (22 dead), there was no civil war. After the Southport stabbings (July 2024), the result was not a war but the arrest of the far-right for rioting. British civil society is more resilient than this doomerism admits.
Summary Conclusion:
The video relies on anecdotal trauma (Robinson's cousin's rape), statistical misreading (terror watch lists), and motivational conspiracy (the establishment wants collapse). It ignores the actual data on integration, the fact that most rapes are intra-racial (white-on-white), and that violent crime has fallen 50% in the UK since 1995. The "tipping point" is not immigration—it is the reactionary violence that the speaker himself is stoking.
Patrick got totally smacked by Mehdi. A must watch
https://www.youtube.com/live/DT3gimXBzAI?si=UBkK8MVjm7BsRmam
Where do yah Politically stand??
That's a tricky question I have learned to masterfully avoid. That's itself an answer.😅
"I stand with the right," I'll say. Yeh.
Right wing, you assume?? I guess.
It's Wrong, and that's the joke.
What I mean is simpler and more honest:
when something goes wrong, you'll find me standing with what's actually correct. Not ideology. Correctness.
The uncomfortable truth? huh.
Most people think they do this.
They confuse loyalty to a tribe with loyalty to reality.
They've outsourced their judgment to a flag, a slogan, a color.
I'm not interested in that bargain.
So yes, I'm "political". But not in the way your partisan intuition expects.
I'm politically engaged the way a surgeon is: by paying attention to what works, what heals, what kills. The aesthetics of your campaign matter less to me than the geometry of your argument.
Confused? Good. That means you're thinking. xd.
Has everyone seen trumps speech where he says Iran attacks their own neighboring nations. Declaring them to hostile for there to be peace amongst them.
Don't be fooled by this, we have launched nukes with in the last few decades and all nato allies launch nukes at each other. It's protocol to make sure Americans neighbors are as weakened as us in an attack. Iran has NO OTHER OPTION. They risk being over run by countries that AMERICA DOESNT WANT TO BE IN CONTROL of that area all the same. America may have even held off attacks to trick Iran and the other nations to hate and distrust each other even more trough these attacks. Every one needs to, 3 times a day, tell there local populous and home country population to press for cooperation with their neighbors. If Iran falls, NOTHING IN THE MIDDLE EAST can stop the jews from hurting all countries and Muslims in the area completely unchecked. As you can see the Iranian government is the ONLY ones doing so... keeping them in check. They NEED EVERYONES support.
Sorry I don't have better options for how to get you involved. I have provided an option that you can do in passing or social media. Just say something supportive about cooperation between Arab nations. I also have cash app I need money to get the smallest **** done as I am always being blocked by jew or even just not supported by Muslims.
Try trending #UnitedMuzz
When using social media 3 times a day for making a chage
Thought that might even be good for this app. We can make a movement name later if we can beat that.
Tonight, Iran attacked Israel to defend Lebanon. I'm curious to know what your opinion is on this؟
Where’s the outrage by farage and his lapdog tommy? https://youtu.be/07Afk7BrVmQ?si=ZdzCR5KKvT3OsX71
Harrow councillor Pamela Fitzpatrick
Joins parliamentary campaign over detention of activists by Pakistani authorities.
Harrow councillor joins parliamentary campaign over detention of activists by Pakistani authorities
https://harrowmonitoringgroup.uk/2026/06/05/harrow-councillor-joins-parliamentary-campaign-over-detention-of-activists-by-pakistani-authorities/
Saudi Arabia blacklisted somebody because of his extremist and terrorist Islamic views, you people brought that same person to lecture in Oyo state. A man that has been doing PR for terrorists oo. ☹️